Neurological outcome scale for traumatic brain injury: III. Criterion-related validity and sensitivity to change in the NABIS hypothermia-II clinical trial.

The neurological outcome scale for traumatic brain injury (NOS-TBI) is a measure assessing neurological functioning in patients with TBI. We hypothesized that the NOS-TBI would exhibit adequate concurrent and predictive validity and demonstrate more sensitivity to change, compared with other well-established outcome measures. We analyzed data from the National Acute Brain Injury Study: Hypothermia-II clinical trial. Participants were 16-45 years of age with severe TBI assessed at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months postinjury. For analysis of criterion-related validity (concurrent and predictive), Spearman's rank-order correlations were calculated between the NOS-TBI and the glasgow outcome scale (GOS), GOS-extended (GOS-E), disability rating scale (DRS), and neurobehavioral rating scale-revised (NRS-R). Concurrent validity was demonstrated through significant correlations between the NOS-TBI and GOS, GOS-E, DRS, and NRS-R measured contemporaneously at 3, 6, and 12 months postinjury (all p<0.0013). For prediction analyses, the multiplicity-adjusted p value using the false discovery rate was <0.015. The 1-month NOS-TBI score was a significant predictor of outcome in the GOS, GOS-E, and DRS at 3 and 6 months postinjury (all p<0.015). The 3-month NOS-TBI significantly predicted GOS, GOS-E, DRS, and NRS-R outcomes at 6 and 12 months postinjury (all p<0.0015). Sensitivity to change was analyzed using Wilcoxon's signed rank-sum test of subsamples demonstrating no change in the GOS or GOS-E between 3 and 6 months. The NOS-TBI demonstrated higher sensitivity to change, compared with the GOS (p<0.038) and GOS-E (p<0.016). In summary, the NOS-TBI demonstrated adequate concurrent and predictive validity as well as sensitivity to change, compared with gold-standard outcome measures. The NOS-TBI may enhance prediction of outcome in clinical practice and measurement of outcome in TBI research.

Early induction of hypothermia for evacuated intracranial hematomas: a post hoc analysis of two clinical trials.

OBJECT: The authors hypothesized that cooling before evacuation of traumatic intracranial hematomas protects the brain from reperfusion injury and, if so, further hypothesized that hypothermia induction before or soon after craniotomy should be associated with improved outcomes. METHODS: The National Acute Brain Injury Study: Hypothermia I (NABIS:H I) was a randomized multicenter clinical trial of 392 patients with severe brain injury treated using normothermia or hypothermia for 48 hours with patients reaching 33°C at 8.4 ± 3 hours after injury. The National Acute Brain Injury Study: Hypothermia II (NABIS:H II) was a randomized, multicenter clinical trial of 97 patients with severe brain injury treated with normothermia or hypothermia for 48 hours with patients reaching 35°C within 2.6 ± 1.2 hours and 33°C within 4.4 ± 1.5 hours of injury. Entry and exclusion criteria, management, and outcome measures in the 2 trials were similar. RESULTS: In NABIS:H II among the patients with evacuated intracranial hematomas, outcome was poor (severe disability, vegetative state, or death) in 5 of 15 patients in the hypothermia group and in 9 of 13 patients in the normothermia group (relative risk 0.44, 95% CI 0.22-0.88; p = 0.02). All patients randomized to hypothermia reached 35°C within 1.5 hours after surgery start and 33°C within 5.55 hours. Applying these criteria to NABIS:H I, 31 of 54 hypothermia-treated patients reached a temperature of 35°C or lower within 1.5 hours after surgery start time, and the remaining 23 patients reached 35°C at later time points. Outcome was poor in 14 (45%) of 31 patients reaching 35°C within 1.5 hours of surgery, in 14 (61%) of 23 patients reaching 35°C more than 1.5 hours of surgery, and in 35 (60%) of 58 patients in the normothermia group (relative risk 0.74, 95%, CI 0.49-1.13; p = 0.16). A meta-analysis of 46 patients with hematomas in both trials who reached 35°C within 1.5 hours of surgery start showed a significantly reduced rate of poor outcomes (41%) compared with 94 patients treated with hypothermia who did not reach 35°C within that time and patients treated at normothermia (62%, p = 0.009). CONCLUSIONS: Induction of hypothermia to 35°C before or soon after craniotomy with maintenance at 33°C for 48 hours thereafter may improve outcome of patients with hematomas and severe traumatic brain injury. Clinical trial registration no.: NCT00178711.

Diffusion tensor imaging of the perforant pathway zone and its relation to memory function in patients with severe traumatic brain injury.

Based on the importance of the perforant pathway (PP) for normal hippocampal function, the vulnerability of temporal structures, and significant memory impairment in patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI), we investigated in vivo changes in the PP zone, hippocampus, and temporal lobe white and gray matter using diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) and volumetric analysis, and any specific relations with memory performance (Verbal Selective Reminding Test, Rey-Osterrieth Complex Figure Test), in 14 patients with severe TBI. Compared to a demographically-similar control group, our patients had significantly decreased fractional anisotropy (FA) and higher apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) for the PP zone bilaterally, and higher ADC bilaterally in the hippocampus. Volumetric analysis revealed significantly decreased volumes in both hippocampi and temporal gray matter bilaterally. Consistent long-term retrieval (CLTR) and delayed recall were significantly related to (1) right and left PP zone ADC, (2) left hippocampus ADC, and (3) left hippocampal volume. Nonverbal memory (immediate and delayed recall) was significantly associated with (1) right and left PP zone ADC, (2) left hippocampal volume, and (3) gray (immediate recall) and white (immediate recall, bilaterally; delayed recall, left) matter temporal volumes. Advanced neuroimaging analysis can detect in vivo changes in the PP zone and temporal structures in patients with severe TBI, with these changes being highly associated with memory impairment.

Very early hypothermia induction in patients with severe brain injury (the National Acute Brain Injury Study: Hypothermia II): a randomised trial.

BACKGROUND: The inconsistent effect of hypothermia treatment on severe brain injury in previous trials might be because hypothermia was induced too late after injury. We aimed to assess whether very early induction of hypothermia improves outcome in patients with severe brain injury. METHODS: The National Acute Brain Injury Study: Hypothermia II (NABIS: H II) was a randomised, multicentre clinical trial of patients with severe brain injury who were enrolled within 2·5 h of injury at six sites in the USA and Canada. Patients with non-penetrating brain injury who were 16-45 years old and were not responsive to instructions were randomly assigned (1:1) by a random number generator to hypothermia or normothermia. Patients randomly assigned to hypothermia were cooled to 35°C until their trauma assessment was completed. Patients who had none of a second set of exclusion criteria were either cooled to 33°C for 48 h and then gradually rewarmed or treated at normothermia, depending upon their initial treatment assignment. Investigators who assessed the outcome measures were masked to treatment allocation. The primary outcome was the Glasgow outcome scale score at 6 months. Analysis was by modified intention to treat. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT00178711. FINDINGS: Enrolment occurred from December, 2005, to June, 2009, when the trial was terminated for futility. Follow-up was from June, 2006, to December, 2009. 232 patients were initially randomised a mean of 1·6 h (SD 0·5) after injury: 119 to hypothermia and 113 to normothermia. 97 patients (52 in the hypothermia group and 45 in the normothermia group) did not meet any of the second set of exclusion criteria. The mean time to 35°C for the 52 patients in the hypothermia group was 2·6 h (SD 1·2) and to 33°C was 4·4 h (1·5). Outcome was poor (severe disability, vegetative state, or death) in 31 of 52 patients in the hypothermia group and 25 of 56 in the normothermia group (relative risk [RR] 1·08, 95% CI 0·76-1·53; p=0·67). 12 patients in the hypothermia group died compared with eight in the normothermia group (RR 1·30, 95% CI 0·58-2·52; p=0·52). INTERPRETATION: This trial did not confirm the utility of hypothermia as a primary neuroprotective strategy in patients with severe traumatic brain injury.

A review of clinical trials of hypothermia treatment for severe traumatic brain injury.

Clinical trials of hypothermia treatment of traumatic brain injury can be divided into (1) trials designed to abort the biochemical cascade after injury-neuroprotection, (2) trials primarily designed to test the effect of hypothermia in reducing elevated intracranial pressure (ICP), and (3) trials with features of both neuroprotection and elevated ICP control. Three of the four clinical trials testing hypothermia induction after failure of conventional means of ICP control showed decreased mortality rate, though sample sizes were small and findings were not always statistically significant. Nine randomized trials have tested hypothermia as a neuroprotectant, inducing it from 2.5 to 15 hours after injury and continuing it for a predetermined period of time regardless of ICP. Eight of these nine trials have been negative with three finding an effect in patients with evacuated hematomas, two of these if hypothermia is rendered before or soon after craniotomy. Despite extensive clinical testing over a range of treatment windows after injury, there is no evidence for the use of hypothermia as a neuroprotectant in patients with diffuse brain injury. Four randomized trials have features of neuroprotection and ICP control, randomizing and initiating hypothermia within 15 hours of injury and continuing hypothermia for the duration of ICP elevation. All found improved outcome and reduced ICP. Based on these findings and the negative results of neuroprotection trials that extended hypothermia for a defined period of time, it is likely that the mechanism of protection in these combined mechanism trials was early control of ICP. This literature suggests the need for clinical trials with two distinct objectives-(1) testing hypothermia for ICP control when conventional means (sedation and paralysis, mannitol, hyperventilation, and cerebrospinal fluid drainage) fail and (2) testing early induction of hypothermia before hematoma evacuation individualizing the duration of hypothermia to the patient's ICP responses.

The temporal stem in traumatic brain injury: preliminary findings.

The temporal stem (TS) of the temporal lobe is a major white matter (WM) region containing several major pathways that connect the temporal lobe with the rest of the brain. Because of its location, it may be particularly vulnerable to shear-strain effects resulting from traumatic brain injury (TBI). A case vignette is presented in a patient with severe brain injury and focal TS pathology. Also, 12 severe TBI subjects unselected for TS pathology were compared to demographically matched, neurologically-intact controls using diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) to examine white matter tracts associated with the TS, including the inferior fronto-occipital fasciculus (IFOF), inferior longitudinal fasciculus (ILF), arcuate fasciculus (AF), cingulum bundle (CB) and the uncinate fasciculus (UF). For each tract, fractional anisotropy (FA) and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) were computed and compared between the two groups and also examined in relationship to memory performance in the TBI subjects. Significant FA and ADC differences were observed in all tracts in the TBI patients compared to controls, with several relationships with memory outcome noted in the IFOF, ILF and AF. Based on these preliminary findings, the potential role of TBI-induced WM disconnection involving the TS is discussed as well as the relationship of TS damage to neurobehavioral outcome. The need for future studies specifically examining the role of TS injury in TBI is emphasized.

Serum IL-6: a candidate biomarker for intracranial pressure elevation following isolated traumatic brain injury.

BACKGROUND: Increased intracranial pressure (ICP) is a serious, life-threatening, secondary event following traumatic brain injury (TBI). In many cases, ICP rises in a delayed fashion, reaching a maximal level 48-96 hours after the initial insult. While pressure catheters can be implanted to monitor ICP, there is no clinically proven method for determining a patient's risk for developing this pathology. METHODS: In the present study, we employed antibody array and Luminex-based screening methods to interrogate the levels of inflammatory cytokines in the serum of healthy volunteers and in severe TBI patients (GCSor= 25 mm Hg had significantly higher IL-6 levels within the first 17 hours of injury as compared to the patients whose ICP remained 128 pg/ml correctly identified 85% of isolated TBI patients who subsequently developed elevated ICP, and values between these cut-off values correctly identified 75% of all patients whose ICP remained

Feasibility of the Neurological Outcome Scale for Traumatic Brain Injury (NOS-TBI) in adults.

This article describes the design and initial implementation of the Neurological Outcome Scale for Traumatic Brain Injury (NOS-TBI) as an adaptation of the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS), specifically for clinical and research use in patients with TBI, including (1) the addition of items specific to TBI, (2) adjustment to the scoring algorithm to allow quantification of deficits in patients who are comatose/vegetative or agitated, and (3) the reassignment of items (i.e., limb ataxia) that are problematic in TBI as supplemental items. The feasibility of using the NOS-TBI is discussed and limitations of the scale are highlighted. This scale offers (1) a cost-effective, brief, practicable, standardized, and quantifiable method of communicating and analyzing neurological deficits in a way that traditional neurological assessment alone cannot currently provide, and (2) a measure that non-physicians can administer. The NOS-TBI may serve a role in clinical practice in patients with TBI similar to the way the NIHSS has functioned for patients following stroke, by serving as a tool for initial stratification of injury severity, and as an outcome measure in clinical trials.

The Neurological Outcome Scale for Traumatic Brain Injury (NOS-TBI): I. Construct validity.

The Neurological Outcome Scale for Traumatic Brain Injury (NOS-TBI) is a measure adapted from the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS), and is intended to capture essential neurological deficits impacting individuals with traumatic brain injury (TBI) (see Wilde et al., 2010 ). In the present study we evaluate the measure's construct validity via comparison with a quantified neurological examination performed by a neurologist. Spearman rank-order correlation between the NOS-TBI and the neurological examination was rho = 0.76, p < 0.0001, suggesting a high degree of correspondence (construct validity) between these two measures of neurological function. Additionally, items from the NOS-TBI compared favorably to the neurological examination items, with correlations ranging from 0.60 to 0.99 (all p < 0.0001). On formal neurological examination, some degree of neurological impairment was observed in every participant in this cohort of individuals undergoing rehabilitation for TBI, and on the NOS-TBI neurological impairment was evident in all but one participant. This study documents the presence of measurable neurological sequelae in a sample of patients with TBI in a post-acute rehabilitation setting, underscoring the need for formal measurement of the frequency and severity of neurological deficits in this population. The results suggest that the NOS-TBI is a valid measure of neurological functioning in patients with TBI.

Serum ceruloplasmin and copper are early biomarkers for traumatic brain injury-associated elevated intracranial pressure.

High intracranial pressure (ICP) is a prominent secondary pathology after traumatic brain injury (TBI) and is a major contributor to morbidity and mortality. Currently, there are no clinically proven methods for predicting which TBI patients will develop high ICP. In the present study, we examined whether the serum levels of the copper-binding protein ceruloplasmin are differentially altered in patients with elevated ICP (> or =25 mmHg) vs. those whose ICP remained below 20 mmHg throughout the study period. Consistent with its role as an acute-phase reactant, we found that ceruloplasmin levels were significantly increased by 3 days post-TBI compared with healthy volunteers. However, prior to this delayed increase, ceruloplasmin levels during the first 24 hr following injury were found to be significantly reduced in patients who subsequently developed high ICP. This decrease was found to have prognostic accuracy in delineating TBI patients based on their ICP status (cutoff of 140 microg/ml; sensitivity: 87%, specificity: 73%), Likewise, low total serum copper (below 1.32 microg/ml) was also found to be predictive of high ICP (sensitivity 86%, specificity 73%). These results suggest that initial serum ceruloplasmin/copper levels may have diagnostic value in predicting patients at risk for developing high intracranial pressure.

Multicenter trial of early hypothermia in severe brain injury.

The North American Brain Injury Study: Hypothermia IIR (NABIS:H IIR) is a randomized clinical trial designed to enroll 240 patients with severe brain injury between the ages of 16 and 45 years. The primary outcome measure is the dichotomized Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS) at 6 months after injury. The study has the power to detect a 17.5% absolute difference in the percentage of patients with a good outcome with a power of 80%. All patients are randomized by waiver of consent unless family is immediately available. Enrollment is within 2.5 h of injury. Patients may be enrolled in the field by emergency medical services personnel affiliated with the study or by study personnel when the patient arrives at the emergency department. Patients who do not follow commands and have no exclusion criteria and who are enrolled in the hypothermia arm of the study are cooled to 35 degrees C as rapidly as possible by intravenous administration of up to 2 liters of chilled crystalloid. Those patients who meet the criteria for the second phase of the protocol (primarily a post-resuscitation GCS 3-8 without hypotension and without severe associated injuries) are cooled to 33 degrees C. Patients enrolled in the normothermia arm receive standard management at normothermia. As of December 2007, 74 patients had been randomized into phase II of the protocol. Patients in the hypothermia arm reached 35 degrees C in 2.7 +/- 1.1 (SD) h after injury and reached 33 degrees C at 4.4 +/- 1.5 h after injury.

Identification of serum biomarkers in brain-injured adults: potential for predicting elevated intracranial pressure.

Brain injury biomarkers may have clinical utility in stratifying injury severity level, predicting adverse secondary events or outcomes, and monitoring the effectiveness of therapeutic interventions. As a biomarker source, serum offers several advantages over cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), including ease of accessibility and reduced risk to the patient. We screened pooled serum samples obtained from 11 severely injured traumatic brain injury (TBI) patients (Glasgow Coma Scale [GCS] 25 mm Hg). Our results support the use of serum as a source for discovery of TBI biomarkers, and indicate that serum biomarkers may have utility for predicting secondary pathologies (e.g., elevated ICP) associated with TBI.

Enhanced catecholamine synthesis in the prefrontal cortex after traumatic brain injury: implications for prefrontal dysfunction.

Traumatic brain injury (TBI)--induced dysfunction of the prefrontal cortex causes many high-level cognitive deficits, including working memory (WM) dysfunction. WM lies at the core of many high-level functions, yet the cellular and molecular mechanisms underlying its dysfunction are poorly understood. Lesion and pharmacological studies in rodents have implicated the medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC), which includes the prelimbic/infralimbic (PL/IL) cortices, in WM tasks. These studies have shown that optimal levels of catecholamine neurotransmission are critical for normalcy of WM function, suggesting that alterations in their synthesis may play a role in WM dysfunction. Using the cortical impact injury model of traumatic brain injury which reproducibly causes working memory deficits in rodents, we have measured the protein levels and activity of tyrosine hydroxylase (TH), the rate-limiting enzyme for catecholamine biosynthesis, and tissue dopamine (DA) and norepinephrine (NE) levels in microdissected PL/IL tissues. Our results show that TBI increases TH protein levels, its activity and tissue DA and NE content in the PL/IL. These findings suggest that altered catecholamine signaling within the PL/IL may contribute to impaired PFC function, and may have implications in the design and implementation of strategies to alleviate prefrontal dysfunction in brain injury patients.

Sulforaphane enhances aquaporin-4 expression and decreases cerebral edema following traumatic brain injury.

Brain edema, the infiltration and accumulation of excess fluid causing an increase in brain tissue volume, often leads to a rise in intracranial pressure and is a key contributor to the morbidity and mortality associated with traumatic brain injury (TBI). The cellular and molecular mechanisms contributing to the development/resolution of TBI-associated brain edema are poorly understood. Aquaporin-4 (AQP4) water channel is expressed at high levels in brain astrocytes, and the bidirectional transport of water through these channels is critical for the maintenance of brain water homeostasis. By using a rodent injury model, we show that TBI decreased AQP4 level in the injury core and modestly increased it in the penumbra region surrounding the core. Postinjury administration of sulforaphane (SUL), an isothiocyanate present in abundance in cruciferous vegetables such as broccoli, attenuated AQP4 loss in the injury core and further increased AQP4 levels in the penumbra region compared with injured animals receiving vehicle. These increases in AQP4 levels were accompanied by a significant reduction in brain edema (assessed by percentage water content) at 3 days postinjury. These findings suggest that the reduction of brain edema in response to SUL administration could be due, in part, to water clearance by AQP4 from the injured brain.

Is keeping cool still hot? An update on hypothermia in brain injury.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The purpose of this review is to examine recent research results for hypothermia as a treatment for brain injury. RECENT FINDINGS: One potential application for hypothermia is as a means of control of elevated intracranial pressure in which hypothermia is induced when intracranial pressure becomes uncontrollable by conventional means. A second application is as a neuroprotectant in which hypothermia is induced very early and maintained for a specified period as a means of diminishing the biochemical cascade that produces secondary brain injury. The clinical data indicate that hypothermia reduces elevated intracranial pressure, but no conclusion can be drawn as to whether this improves outcome over existing techniques (eg, mannitol and barbiturates). There is little evidence that hypothermia acts as a neuroprotectant in trials, all of which used treatment windows of over 4 hours. SUMMARY: Hypothermia is a useful adjunct to barbiturates and mannitol to control elevated intracranial pressure. The results of trials that have tested systemic hypothermia as a neuroprotectant have been negative or equivocal, and cooling may have been induced outside the treatment window.

Enhancement of tyrosine hydroxylase phosphorylation and activity by glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor.

Although glial cell-line derived neurotrophic factor (GDNF) acts as a potent survival factor for dopaminergic neurons, it is not known whether GDNF can directly alter dopamine synthesis. Tyrosine hydroxylase (TH) is the rate-limiting enzyme for dopamine biosynthesis, and its activity is regulated by phosphorylation on three seryl residues: Ser-19, Ser-31, and Ser-40. Using a TH-expressing human neuroblastoma cell line and rat primary mesencephalic neuron cultures, the present study examined whether GDNF alters the phosphorylation of TH and whether these changes are accompanied by increased enzymatic activity. Exposure to GDNF did not alter the TH protein level in either neuroblastoma cells or in primary neurons. However, significant increases in the phosphorylation of Ser-31 and Ser-40 were detected within minutes of GDNF application in both cell types. Enhanced Ser-31 and Ser-40 phosphorylation was associated with increased TH activity but not dopamine synthesis in neuroblastoma cells, possibly because of the absence of l-aromatic amino acid decarboxylase activity in these cells. In contrast, increased phosphorylation of Ser-31 and Ser-40 was found to enhance dopamine synthesis in primary neurons. Pharmacological experiments show that Erk and protein kinase A phosphorylate Ser-31 and Ser-40, respectively, and that their inhibition blocked both TH phosphorylation and activity. Our results indicate that, in addition to its role as a survival factor for dopaminergic neurons, GDNF can directly increase dopamine synthesis.

Post-trauma administration of caffeine plus ethanol reduces contusion volume and improves working memory in rats.

It has been demonstrated that ethanol exerts dose-dependent effects, both beneficial and detrimental, on the outcome of traumatic brain injury (TBI). Recently, it has been reported that co-administration of caffeine (10 mg/kg) and a low amount of alcohol (0.65 g/kg; caffeinol) reduces cortical infarct volume up to 80%, and improves motor coordination, following a rodent model of reversible common carotid/middle cerebral artery occlusion. However, the protective effects of caffeinol following other CNS insults, nor its influence on cognitive function, have been examined. Using a controlled cortical impact model of brain injury, the effect of caffeinol administration on TBI-associated motor and cognitive deficits was assessed. When given 15 min following injury, caffeinol reduced cortical tissue loss and improved working memory. However, no influence on motor skills, Morris water maze performance or associative learning and memory was observed. Delayed administration (6 h post-injury) of caffeinol containing a dose of ethanol (1 g/kg) previously demonstrated to improve motor performance eliminated the working memory benefit and cortical protection. These results indicate that early administration of caffeinol may be beneficial in lessening some of the deficits and cortical tissue loss associated with brain trauma.

Waiver of consent in studies of acute brain injury.

A multicenter trial of hypothermia in patients with acute brain injury, designed to accrue 140 patients per year and randomizing in less than 6 h from injury, enrolled 392 patients. The design was to achieve 33 degrees C within 8 h after injury. For the first 9 months of the trial, the only consent mechanism permitted by federal regulations was prospective, informed consent. In the subsequent 33 months, after a change in federal regulations, waiver of consent could be used when family could not be located. Waiver of consent was used in 62% of patients enrolled. In the first 9 months of the trial, accrual was 65 patients. In the subsequent 3 years, an average yearly accrual was 127 patients. In the first 9 months, time from injury to randomization was 4.5 +/- 1.2 h; time to achievement of target temperature was 11.7 +/- 2.6 h. In years when waiver of consent was permitted, randomization time was 4.1 +/- 1.1 h, and time to target temperature was 7.9 +/- 2.7 h. For all years of the study, waiver of consent was used for 53% of minorities, 47% of unskilled workers, 33% of nonminorities, and 29% of skilled or professional workers. Minorities were underrepresented by 30% in the first 9 months of the study. We conclude that it is impracticable and unjust to perform studies of acute brain injury without use of waiver of consent when the treatment window is less than 6 h.

Altered expression of novel genes in the cerebral cortex following experimental brain injury.

Damage to the cerebral cortex results in neurological impairments such as motor, attention, memory and executive dysfunctions. To examine the molecular mechanisms contributing to these deficits, mRNA expression was profiled using high-density cDNA microarray hybridization after experimental cortical impact injury in mice. The mRNA levels at 2 h, 6 h, 24 h, 3 days and 14 days after injury were compared with those of control animals. This revealed 86 annotated genes and 24 expression sequence tags (ESTs) as being differentially expressed with a 1.5-fold or greater change. Quantitative real-time PCR analysis was used to independently verify these results for selected genes. Seven functional classes of genes were found to be altered following injury, including transcription factors, signal transduction genes and inflammatory proteins. While a few of these genes have been previously reported to be differentially regulated following injury, the most of the genes have not been previously implicated in traumatic brain injury (TBI) pathophysiology. For example, consistent with previous reports, the transcription factor c-jun and the neurotrophic factor bdnf mRNA levels were altered as a result of TBI. Among the novel genes, the mRNA levels for the high mobility group protein 1 (hmg-1), the regulator of G-protein signaling 2 (rgs-2), the transforming growth factor beta inducible early growth response (tieg), the inhibitor of DNA binding 3 (id3), and the heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein H (hnrnp h) were changed following injury. The functional significance of these genes in neurite outgrowth, neuronal regeneration, and plasticity following injury are discussed.

Clinical trials in head injury.

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) remains a major public health problem globally. In the United States the incidence of closed head injuries admitted to hospitals is conservatively estimated to be 200 per 100,000 population, and the incidence of penetrating head injury is estimated to be 12 per 100,000, the highest of any developed country in the world. This yields an approximate number of 500,000 new cases each year, a sizeable proportion of which demonstrate significant long-term disabilities. Unfortunately, there is a paucity of proven therapies for this disease. For a variety of reasons, clinical trials for this condition have been difficult to design and perform. Despite promising pre-clinical data, most of the trials that have been performed in recent years have failed to demonstrate any significant improvement in outcomes. The reasons for these failures have not always been apparent and any insights gained were not always shared. It was therefore feared that we were running the risk of repeating our mistakes. Recognizing the importance of TBI, the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS) sponsored a workshop that brought together experts from clinical, research, and pharmaceutical backgrounds. This workshop proved to be very informative and yielded many insights into previous and future TBI trials. This paper is an attempt to summarize the key points made at the workshop. It is hoped that these lessons will enhance the planning and design of future efforts in this important field of research.